首页 | 爱情文章 | 亲情文章 | 友情文章 | 生活随笔 | 校园文章 | 经典文章 | 人生哲理 | 励志文章 | 搞笑文章 | 心情日记 | 英语文章 | 会员中心
当前位置:文章故事>爱情文章>文章内容 经典美文欣赏

川师大杀人案

An Oklahoma man used pandemic relief funds to have his name cleared of murder_我的网站

天地争霸美猴王

一 |     GREENWOOD, Ark. -- Ricky Dority spends most of his days playing with his grandchildren, feeding chickens and working in the yard where he lives with his son's family.It's a jarring change from where he was just several months ago, locked in a cell serving a life prison sentence at Oklahoma's Joseph Harp Correctional Center in a killing he said he didn't commit. After more than two decades behind bars, Dority had no chance at being released — until he used his pandemic relief funds to hire a dogged private investigator. The investigator and students at the Oklahoma Innocence Project at Oklahoma City University, which is dedicated to exonerating wrongful convictions in the state, found inconsistencies in the state's account of a 1997 cold-case killing, and Dority's conviction was vacated in June by a Sequoyah County judge.Now, the 65-year-old says he’s enjoying the 5-acre property in a quiet neighborhood of well-to-do homes in the rolling, forested hills of the Arkansas River Valley outside of Fort Smith. “If you’re gone for a lot of years, you don’t take it for granted anymore.”Dority is one of nearly 3,400 people who have been exonerated across the country since 1989, mostly over murder convictions, according to the National Registry of Exonerations. In Oklahoma, there have been more than 43 exonerations in that time, not including three new exonerations this year. The cases underscore a serious problem facing a judicial system in which many old convictions resulted from overworked defense attorneys, shoddy forensic work, overzealous prosecutors and outdated investigative techniques.The problem is particularly acute given Oklahoma's history of sending people to death row, where 11 inmates have been exonerated since 1981. The issue has pushed a Republican-led legislative panel to consider whether a death penalty moratorium should be imposed.In Oklahoma County, Glynn Ray Simmons was freed after spending nearly 50 years in prison, including time on death row, in a 1974 killing after a judge determined prosecutors failed to turn over evidence in the case, including a police report that showed an eyewitness might have identified other suspects.And just this week, Perry Lott, who served more than 30 years in prison, had his rape and burglary conviction vacated in Pontotoc County after new DNA testing excluded him as the perpetrator. Pontotoc County, in particular, has come under intense scrutiny for a series of wrongful convictions in the 1980s that have been the subject of numerous books, including John Grisham’s “The Innocent Man,” which he produced into a six-part documentary on Netflix. The most common causes of wrongful convictions are eyewitness misidentification, misapplication of forensic science, false confessions, coerced pleas and official misconduct, generally by police or prosecutors, according to the Innocence Project, a national organization based in New York.In Dority's case, he said he was railroaded by an overzealous sheriff and a state prosecutor eager to solve the killing of 28-year-old Mitchell Nixon, who was found beaten to death in 1997.Investigators who reopened the case in 2014 coerced a confession from another man, Rex Robbins, according to Andrea Miller, the legal director of the Oklahoma Innocence Project. Robbins, who would plead guilty to manslaughter in Nixon's killing, implicated Dority, who at the time was in a federal prison on a firearms conviction. Dority said he knew he didn't have anything to do with the crime and found paperwork that proved he had been arrested on the day of the killing.“I thought I was clear because I knew I didn’t have anything do with that murder,” Dority said. “But they tried me for it and found me guilty of it.”Jurors heard about Robbins' confession and testimony from a police informant who said Dority had changed bloody clothes at his house the night of the killing. They convicted him of first-degree murder and recommended a sentence of life without parole.After years in prison, while most inmates spent their federal COVID-19 relief check in the commissary, Dority used his to hire a private investigator, he said. Bobby Staton had mostly investigated insurance fraud, but he took on the case and realized quickly that it was riddled with holes, Staton said. He eventually turned to the university's Oklahoma Innocence Project, which assigned a law student, Abby Brawner, to help investigate.Their investigation turned when Staton and Brawner visited Robbins in the maximum-security Oklahoma State Reformatory in Granite, and he recanted his statement implicating Dority. “It was pretty intimidating,” Brawner said. “Especially when you're going in to meet someone who doesn't know you're coming and doesn't want to talk to you.”Brawner and Staton also learned the informant didn't live at the home where he told investigators Staton showed up in bloody clothes. When the actual homeowner testified at a hearing this summer, the judge dismissed the case.Dority's original attorneys were ineffective for not discovering the informant didn't live at the home, the judge said, giving prosecutors 90 days to decide whether they will retry him. That three months has been extended, and prosecutors have said they intend to ask the judge for more time for DNA testing. Dority, confident in his innocence, said he's not concerned about additional forensic testing.Sequoyah County District Attorney Jack Thorp and former Sheriff Ron Lockhart did not respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press. But Assistant District Attorney James Dunn, who is overseeing the case and was not in the office when it was originally prosecuted, said he agreed with the judge's dismissal after hearing the homeowner's testimony and learning a witness “was not credible.” “The last thing I want to see is an innocent person in prison for a crime they didn't commit," Dunn said. "Because that means the person who actually did commit the crime, or those persons, are still out there.” Meanwhile, Dority is learning to use a smartphone and the television remote control, he said. He's thankful to Staton and the Innocence Project and says his case proves others are wrongfully imprisoned in Oklahoma.“After they’ve done what they’ve done to me, I know there are people in that prison who are innocent that need to be out and need help getting out,” he said. “If they hadn’t gotten me out, I’d have been in there for the rest of my life.”。    

阅读此文大概需要2-3分钟,诚邀您点击右上角“关注”按钮,先点后看,养成习惯,您的支持与鼓励便是我们创作的最大动力!
要给普京的就职仪式“献礼”吗?戏剧性一幕出现,乌克兰两名上校暗杀泽连斯基未遂被抓,美俄接连回应,说了些啥?
这段时间,乌克兰总统泽连斯基的小日子可以说是过得不怎么顺心,一方面是具有重要战略意义的重镇恰索夫亚尔或将失守,一方面是乌克兰内部时不时传出要闹政变、推翻政府的消息。
正所谓祸不单行,上周六,俄罗斯官方宣布,将泽连斯基、乌陆军司令等多名乌克兰高级官员列入通缉名单中。
乌克兰方面对此不以为然,认为这是毫无意义的做法,不过是俄罗斯用来吸引关注的手段罢了。但还是表示非常不满,认为俄罗斯这是将乌克兰的尊严按在地上“摩擦”。
没想到俄罗斯的行动这么快就来了。据观察者网报道,本周二,乌克兰国家安全局在“电报”社交平台发布消息称,抓获了两名企图暗杀泽连斯基的乌克兰国家保卫局军官。
乌克兰国家网表示,其中一名上校是乌国家保卫局的部门领导安德烈·古克,他被指控收集并传播泽连斯基等人的机密信息。
乌国家安全局还表示,俄罗斯的计划是密切监视泽连斯基以及其他乌克兰高级官员,他们原计划是用导弹来袭击目标,在必要时可以使用自杀式无人机。这两名涉案者被指控犯下叛国罪等罪名,将面临终身监禁。
值得一提的是,乌克兰国家安全局宣布抓捕了两名刺杀泽连斯基军官这天,克里姆林宫恰好在举行普京的就职典礼,正式宣誓就职后,普京开启第五个总统任期。难道说,这两名乌克兰上校刺杀泽连斯基,是准备给普京的就职仪式“献礼”?
这一点得到了乌克兰的证实。乌方透露了更多细节,称这次暗杀行动是俄罗斯国家安全局策划的,第五局的特工网络用金钱策反了这两名乌军官,并秘密向他们提供了大量的武器装备,包括自杀式无人机,让他们找机会暗杀泽连斯基,当作就职“礼物”送给普京。

二 |

美国方面表示,对乌克兰挫败了潜在暗杀泽连斯基企图感到非常高兴,俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫则是称,乌克兰方面放出的消息不太可能是准确的。
毕竟从本轮俄乌冲突爆发以来,乌克兰方面就曾多次指控俄罗斯对泽连斯基实施了“斩首行动”,但每次俄方都强调,这些指控是毫无依据。

三 |

其实,幕后主使也不一定是俄罗斯,毕竟在泽连斯基被俄当局官方通缉后,乌克兰内部反泽连斯基的势力就顺势而起,决心政变推翻泽连斯基,早日结束战争。

四 |

要知道,俄乌开战后,俄方给了乌克兰很多次谈判的机会,希望能坐下来好好说。但泽连斯基百般不愿,已经把乌克兰捆上了北约争霸的战车,誓死效忠于美国,打压俄罗斯的生存空间,引起了民愤。
本来泽连斯基的任期这个月就要结束了,可没想到,两个月前泽连斯基却以“国家处于紧急状态”为由,取消了总统选举,引起了诸多质疑。
所以说,在这个时候暗杀泽连斯基的,真不一定是俄罗斯,也可能是乌克兰国内的反对派在行险招,为了早日结束战争推翻政府。

五 |

由于平台规则,方便后续为您推送类似文章,以最快的速度获取最新资讯,如果您喜欢这篇文章,请点赞、评论、转发,谢谢!

Current article:http://yay3.dangnichuaitongjuanye.pics/mh3b/3nyt42.html

Published on:04:42:00


Copyright © 2007-2014 我的网站 版权所有.情感文章,散文随笔,美文故事在线阅读